Video game quotes
April 23, 2009 at 8:59 pm | In games | 2 CommentsThought this might be fun (?) here’s some quotes from computer games. Just tell me via e-mail or face to face (preferably not via comments) where they come from and I’ll tell you if you’re right. Bonus points (thought the points don’t mean anything) if you tell me who said them. Answers soon!
1. “Our Princess is in another castle”
2. “Dont Shoot! I’m with the science team!”
3. “YOU CANNOT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS!”
4. “Pick a box. It’s contents will help you on your way.”
5. “Didn’t we have some fun though? Remember when the platform was sliding into the fire pit and I said ‘Goodbye’ and you were like ‘NO WAY!’ and then I was all ‘We pretended we were going to murder you’? That was great.”
6. “Spinning bird kick!”
7. “I am Error”
8. “I don’t use people indiscriminately. Except ***”
9. “FINISH HIM!”
10. “you spoony bard!”
Anyone got any other favourites?
Top Ten Tuesday: Computer Games
April 13, 2009 at 11:38 pm | In Top ten Tuesday, games | 6 CommentsIt seems that the only posts I’ve been making lately have been these top tens. This is more a sign of my being quite busy than it is my being lazy. Of course. Ahem.
Anyhoo, here’s a list of my favourite games, in order of how much time I’ve spent/ wasted playing them. Enjoy!
1. Football Manager/ Championship manager (in various incarnations)
2. Pro Evolution Soccer (since 2: before that I was a FIFA boy until I saw the light!)
3. Half Life, sequels and add-ons
4. Gran Turismo 4
5. Command & Conquer: Red Alert and sequels
6. ToCa Race Driver 3
7. Civilisation 4
8. Portal
9. Street Fighter IV
10. Mario Kart (in all its incarnations, though the wii version was a bit weak)
Of these, I think my favourite is probably PES.
As well, I’ve thought of some things that could make good computer games, but won’t really..
A: Twitter: the game. Try to earn as many followers as possible by making wacky and zany tweets. Alternative mode would be then to lose all those followers as quickly as possible by making really boring tweets.
B: Grand Theft Charity: Go round a large city commiting random acts of kindness. Bonus rounds include being a charity worker on a high street stopping people to subscribe to the charity (less kind people call them chuggers) and buying buns at a village fete.
C: Football Chairman: Take your club to the top by appointing managers and mortgaging the club’s future on the highly risky gamble of getting a Champions League place!
D: Christian Dating Game: Stealth genre: Ask a girl/ boy out on a date and see if you can avoid everybody else passing judgement on your relationship! (possible sequel: stay single and avoid having people try to set you up with someone!)
E: Pro Evolution Curling. Scotland are World Champions. Now you can be too! (Actually this could be really good on the wii, what with all the brushing…)
F: Mighty Boosh: the game. It won’t be all that good, but people will tell you it is and tell you you’re no fun if you don’t enjoy it! (resentful much?)
G: Dad joke-off: MMORPG: challenge people online to tell dad jokes to each other. Whoever can’t take any more loses, and there could be a worldwide online ladder!
H: that’s enough now, actually.
Up
June 25, 2008 at 2:16 pm | In TV, games | Leave a CommentBeen busy for a while and meant to review some stuff. So now I am sort of on holiday for a bit, here goes…
1. Series review of Peep Show series 5.
Peep Show remains one of the funniest things on TV, but you can’t help but wonder if it’s lost direction since Mark and Sophie’s botched marriage. Whereas the previous series had some kind of event that it seemed to be leading up to (e.g. mark and sophie getting engaged, jeremy getting married, mark getting married etc), this one seemed to lack any kind of overall arc. This may not necessarily have been a bad thing, because it gives the writers a certain degree of freedom as to scenarios, but Mark’s obsession of finding “the one” (attempts include a girl who brings her own cheese to work and a woman who believes in the power of crystal skulls) didn’t seem to lead anywhere as you thought it might. Still, there are some brilliant scenarios like the scene in a stationery cupboard, and Jez trying to get aroused over a £20 note, and many other cringeworthy moments (“I haven’t been raped! She didn’t put anything up my bum!”) which make the show great. The lack of overall direction can be forgiven, however, when you hear Sophie’s bombshell at the end of the last episode. No surprises guessing what Series 6 is going to culminate in… So yes this is probably the weakest series to date, but it’s still miles better than a lot of other stuff out at the minute, especially anything that claims to be Mighty.
2. Lego Indiana Jones (PS3)
Or Lego Star Wars by any other name. This is more or less identical to its predecessor in every way, although obviously the stories, characters and their abilities are different. I shall start by saying it is entertaining, but it has many, many flaws.
The main one being it is extremely infuriating at times, and this coming largely from the fact that the rest of it is much too easy. I lost count of how many times we tried to do the mine cart section in “Temple of Doom” because there was a glitch that meant you couldn’t achieve one of the goals in co-op mode, or how many times Indy fell into the snakes or how many times I tried to kill that annoying woman in Temple of Doom and she came back to life.
That said, there are a lot of funny moments (although some imagery was toned down for kids) and it is a laugh when playing with a friend, but to be honest, it’s more suited for the bargain bin than as a full game in its own right. Basically, it’s a big advert for the new movie (which doesn’t appear in the game. How odd…)
3. Race Driver: Grid (PS3)
Gran Turismo 4 demanded too much. GT Racer sucked. Formula One Championship Edition was outdated when it arrived. Enter Race Driver:Grid.
There are many reasons why this can claim to be the new daddy of all the racers, a lot of which are to do with GT5 not being released until after my grandson graduates.
However, to compare it to an unreleased game is unfair, so let’s judge it on its own merits. To say it’s the best racer ever might be hyperbole, but it’s certainly up there, and for one very good reason. THE AI MAKES MISTAKES. Yes. I don’t know how long it’s been, but a game where the AI makes errors like you do has been long in the pipeline. GT4 occasionally showed flashes of it, but the AI generally only made mistakes because you nudged it out of the way and it ended up on the grass. Here, the cars go in too deep at corners, suffer from understeer and oversteer and cause pile-ups, the like of which I haven’t seen since Destruction Derby 2. Which reminds me that there is a brilliant Destruction Derby still “last man standing” event where you have to manoeuvre a car with hideous handling around a track with crossovers and mutliple pile-ups, which is a highlight for me.
As is the “Pro Tuned” category which has you haring around Japanese docks littered with loose boxes and tyres and “Touge” (a one-on-on race along a mountainside) which is probably a direct attempt to incorporate elements of “need for speed” into it.
It’s absolutely brilliant and I recommend it for whatever platform you might have, though I hear the DS version is a bit ropy.
Automatic for the People
June 20, 2008 at 4:28 pm | In Friends, games | 2 CommentsMore recycled tosh: this time some thoughts on pub quizzes. Enjoy.
<<What is proper when it comes to pub quizzes? Well, wonder no more as I present to you the unwrriten (but now typed) rules of the pub quiz. My thanks to James Gray (no, the other one)for assisting me.
Arrive on time
The first thing about pub quizzes is that everyone is present for every question. Therefore if the quiz starts at 9, take some time to order drinks and take in the atmosphere, at around half eight if the quiz is a popular one. Once there, settle in and introduce yourself to any team members you may not know, since group cohesion is vital. Make sure that you pay your fee and split it evenly if one is required.
Team name
The team name is not so important, unless there are points on offer for best name. Bear in mind that an “amusing” name may get annoying as the evening goes on, so make sure it has longevity. If it is your first time doing the quiz, don’t pick names with swear words in them since the quizmaster might not like that so much (especially inappropriate in a church quiz) and he may mark you more harshly. However, if you know the quizmaster is fine with it, then by all means, as long as it is funny. This also applies to insults towards the quizmaster and his or her appearance/girlfriend/mum.
Make sure it’s easy to read and not too hard to pronounce, and no silly Prince-style symbols. If you want to make a name for your team, simple is best. The best quiz name I know of was
“Operation: Harold Bishop”.
Team size
Ideal team size varies. The golden rule is check out the other teams to see how big they are. No size is too small, but if appropriate, split up into two groups of roughly equal size. Do not help each other’s teams as this will be the same as having one big team.
Writer-downer
A writer-downer is to be appointed, and should be someone with neat, legible handwriting. They need not be the same for the whole quiz, but should realise that someone else may want to do it and be gracious and let them do it. For more see “Questions” and “Moguls”.
Questions
The quizmaster will ask the questions, and while he or she is doing this, chatter should be kept to a minimum. When a question is read out, shouting out a ridiculous answer is not appropriate-it wears thin very quickly.
If the writer-downer knows the answer he or she can write it down, but should show everyone else the answer, just in case someone wants to correct it.
Moguls
A Mogul is defined as somebody in a pub quiz team who seems to have a high degree of knowledge in every area.
There are two types:
The first is the team-worker mogul. He or she will have an answer ready, but will consider everyone else’s response before asserting that their answer is the correct one. It is worthwhile having one or two of these on a team.
The second is the dominant mogul. He or she will want to hog the paper and not accept anyone else’s answer as correct, perhaps even being stubborn enough to insist that an answer they know is wrong is correct. It is vital that you do not give the mogul the task of writer-downer. I would suggest not having more than one such player on a team, since the whole point of the quiz is to have fun, and one person’s selfishness can ruin it for everybody.
Group participation
It is vital that everyone feels valued as a quiz participant, after all, everyone paid an entrance fee. Thus, those who seem to be answering fewer questions should perhaps be given the task of writer-downer, so they feel included in the group.
Guessing
You may not know an answer. If someone has a vague inkling to an answer and noone else does, then put that down. I have some all-purpose answers for guessing
“Winston Churchill” and “Margaret Thatcher” are useful for “history” for example. Leaving blank answers is the ultimate no-no in pub quizzes. If you can’t buy a ticket you won’t win the raffle. Also, don’t put stupid answers down as this will annoy the marker, which is not what you want. You might find that type two moguls won’t accept guesses the “know” to be wrong. If they don’t know the answer, tell them it’s a good idea to put something down, ven if it seems wrong. Lastly, for true or false type questions, if none of you genuinely know the answer, then take a vote or toss a coin, then no individual can be blamed.
Mobile phones
There’s no harm in keeping your phone on, but in the interests of fairness and transparency, try to use it between rounds when your team has handed in the answers. It’s more fun to win by not cheating.
Specialist rounds
There is no avoiding the music and picture rounds. Usually, there are double points on offer for artist and song, and perhaps extra for naming the film whose soundtrack it was on, or the album or year of release. Be considerate by not speaking too loudly during this round, but you need to communicate your answer to the writer-downer so whisper or speak softly if needs be.
The picture round is usually a badly photocopied piece of paper with pictures of A-list celebrities in their youth or in some amusing situation. No writer-downer is required for this round as it’s usually played over several “question” rounds and can be filled in at your leisure. Make sure your answers are sensible and legible and that everyone is content with the answers before handing in.
There may also be sport and current affairs rounds, but these are fading out and all the rounds seem to come under the banner “general knowledge”. This is a great pity, but progress is progress. Where these rounds still exist, one player may nominate him or herself as a specialist. They should not be given writer-downer duties so everyone can object to an answer that was given, and not just assume they were right because they were a “specialist”. I would keep specialisations to myself, personally, as it is easy to get annoyed when someone usurps your position.
Reading out of answers
The golden rule is that the quizmaster is always right even when (s)he’s wrong. So when they read out an answer you disagree with, accept it with good grace. They’re only human too, you know. Likewise, excessive cheering over an answer probably won’t win you too many friends.
Results
Ideally, results will be read from the bottom upwards, so the team that finishes last will be read first. Finishing last is, for some, a great honour and will often be awarded with a booby prize. It is only polite to applaud the team’s efforts as they collect it.
It is generally not the case that you applaud everyone else’s name as they are read out. The teams in question probably aren’t too bothered and will probably not want to be “congratulated” for mediocrity. When the second-place team (and hence the winner) is announced, applaud them, even if while cheering for victory. Likewise, applaud the winners. If you were dissatisfied as to their conduct, don’t applaud them, but don’t boo them either.
Prizes
Should be shared equally throughout the team, regardless of participation. >>
Well done if you got this far. That I spent so much time writing this is probably to be feared…
“The Empty Child”
May 24, 2008 at 11:13 am | In games | Leave a CommentUnfortunately, my choice of theme for my post titles has not been terribly conducive to writing stuff that is relevant to it. So hence the following post has nothing to do with the title and I apologise.
Anyhoo, before I went to Amserdam last week, I got a package from Amazon, and inside it I was pleased to find a copy of racing game rFactor, and I have to say it’s very good. It’s not as good as Gran Turismo or Race Driver, but passable nonetheless.
It’s got something that no-one else seems to have, though, and that is an almost inifite capacity for modification. I’ve already downloaded Monaco, Paul Ricard and Norisring and the 2007 F1 cars, and hope to download the GP2 mod too.
It’s actually quite difficult in terms of the controls, but I think that’s largely because I was using the keyboard and don’t have the desire to get a steering wheel or a control pad (and probably am not very good at these sort of games in any case) and the AI leaves much to be desired (it’s not uncommon for it to drive straight on at easy corners or skip chicanes) but it’s still very enjoyable if you enjoy simulation rather than arcade. Yus.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.